Glass Half Empty with Oil
Let me start this blog by saying—I’m no expert on the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. I am continuously learning more about the problem through news stories, and have tried to follow new developments through daily news updates.
Many people are frustrated with how BP has addressed the problem—specifically, why is it taking so long to fix it? A number of failed attempts to stop the leak have caused the public to become increasingly disappointed with the situation.
It would be easy to harp on what BP has done wrong in the public relations area—it seems I would have plenty to blog about—but allow me to take a more objective approach to this situation and examine some of the things the company has done right, along with what needs improvement.
Glass Half Full: Staying in Front of the Media
BP executives have appeared on countless news shows. Just this week, BP’s Chief Operating Officer Doug Suttles appeared on three morning shows to deliver the latest update and acknowledge the public’s frustration.
Those are things people need to see and hear—acknowledgement and humbleness. During a crisis of this kind, where a company has made a mistake and is trying to correct it, the public doesn’t want to see a talking head or be read a company statement. They want to identify the real people involved in the solution, and hear the plan directly from a decision maker’s mouth. The public wants to feel like their concerns are being heard and that the company knows there is a demand to do more.
Glass Half Empty: Transparency
Transparency is one of the hardest things to balance when you are in the middle of a crisis. In the beginning of the oil spill, more facts—and seemingly a deeper truth—spilled out as well. BP seemed to approach the problem optimistically at first, but may not have been as forthcoming to the potential dangers of what would happen if the initial plan didn’t work.
Even with the latest efforts, the company says it is 60 to 70 percent confident that the plan will contain the oil, but it’s hard not to believe the company is shooting in the dark at this point. Whether BP executives believe they are protecting the public by not creating more panic or outrage, it doesn’t do any good to not be completely forthcoming with the situation—especially in this day and age with 24-hour media and the high likelihood of the truth coming out eventually. (Just ask any number of the high-profile men who have had cheating scandals erupt around them.)
BP has said that the situation will improve, seemingly made promises to the public about solutions and even been misleading about how dire the situation is. In order for the public to trust you, you have to be upfront—even if you find yourself in a difficult and embarrassing situation.
Glass Half Full: Continuous Effort
I know the effort has fallen short of a solution, but let me explain this glass half-full section.
BP has made various attempts to stop the oil spill and has communicated its efforts to media and the public. The company has tried containment and a chemical dispersant, and will soon try a “top kill.” BP has publicly explained the plan every time it has taken a new approach.
The company has also pledged money to continue the Gulf cleanup even after the oil is contained, and has promised educational programs in the aftermath. It’s a hard line to walk when a company or person has created harm and money is promised as part of the solution. No, throwing money at the problem won’t solve it, but money will definitely be needed to rehabilitate the Gulf, and BP is the entity that will owe it.
Glass Half Empty: Tension Between BP and the Government
Whether or not you believe BP should bear sole responsibility to contain the spill, the open back and forth between the company and the federal government has not helped the public’s confidence. This tension has only been increased by political personalities and media coverage, but a more unified front between the government and BP would go a long way.
There was even a quote from White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs who said the government was going to put its “boot on the throat of BP” to make sure they do all that’s necessary to contain the spill. Really? So the government is a middle school bully who hates the oil company and will beat it up to ensure that it does the right thing? That makes me uncomfortable.
As a company or public figure, the trickiest time for public relations is when you are in the midst of the catastrophe or controversy. Every move you make will be scrutinized and people will be evaluating whether or not you are doing enough. It’s important to learn from past mistakes and be forthcoming with the public. Most importantly, public relations strategies must continue to evolve and adapt to the current situation.
-Levente Smith
